Comments on: Has Our Freedom To Be Sexual Turned To Pressure To Be Sexual?

By: Arsene Hodali

Arsene Hodali — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:35:18 +0000

Yah, I get that. But question is has the “allowance” of it forced people to recognize their innate sexuality too soon?

By: Grokodile

Grokodile — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:23:58 +0000

I don’t think the freedoms in society create the pressures… they just affect whether or not it is hidden.

Sex is something that is innate in us. It will be expressed whether or not society “allows” it.

By: pharmacy technician

pharmacy technician — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:03:02 +0000

nice post. thanks.

By: Arsene Hodali

Arsene Hodali — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:58:45 +0000

Thank you for the spell check, greatly appreciated.

And thank you for at least reading 98% of it. Most people don’t read that far.

By: tja

tja — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:10:05 +0000

if you improved your spelling and grammar, i might have gotten to the end of this article.

a few tips:
-but what about the few, the oh so few, that isn’t having sex? (that isn’t? how about WHO AREN’T)
-who’s sole mission (WHOSE)

By: Arsene Hodali

Arsene Hodali — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:29:34 +0000

Brett- First of all, I like your domain name, something more people should do.

Surprisingly (in a good way), it’s like an extension on the post.

By: Brett - DareToExpress.com

Brett - DareToExpress.com — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:49:34 +0000

Hey Arsene,

I think that the opposite has happened: I think people are freer to talk about sex in general, but are a little uncomfortable with their sexuality (particularly in men). So maybe this is the result of the sexual pressure that’s been created – but, overall, a lot of guys (I don’t know about girls) are uncomfortable with expressing their sexual desires, particularly around girls they find attractive. It’s an interesting conundrum and has a lot to do with society’s liberalism towards sex while simultaneously condemning personal sexuality.